Richmond Hill Animal Hospital veterinary clinic reviews
Richmond Hill Animal Hospital
veterinary clinic
Treats:
Cats
Treats:
Dogs
Services:
After-Hours Emergency Care
Services:
Boarding
Services:
Surgery
Ownership:
Small Chain
Phone:
912 756 3999
Profile updated: 5/1/07
Submit profile update
Rating: 3.5 (1-5)
based on 5 reviews.
Veterinary Clinic Richmond Hill Animal Hospital
has a good overall rating on VetRatingz.com.
The following postings have not been substantiated by VetRatingz.com.
Submit a news article about this veterinary clinic
Rate this veterinary clinic
| KEY |
Date |
|
|
|
M
o
n
e
t
a
r
y
V
a
l
u
e
|
Comments
|
|
|
8/30/19 |
3 |
3 |
5 |
1 |
Vet Tech and assistants were polite and helpful. Dr. Kadri was abrupt and unfriendly to our dog. It was our dog's (foster) first visit with him. He neglected to ask any questions regarding her health or behaviours. He refused to look at a photo given by groomer. He ignored what we were trying to explain. He cut me off and talked over me to blame groomer and food. The vet tech attempted to advocate with her findings but he cut her off as well. Our dog was there for a wellness check and vaccinations as well as our concern. He did not take temperature, listen to her heart. Look in her mouth, eyes or inspect her body. He did give the shots and medicine for one ear. When I tried to ask for his health findings he simply said fine. I asked if she was overweight and he said no she isn't underweight. I do not recommend this vet.
|
|
|
|
|
|
SYSTEM: 2 positive duplicate or disallowed ratings automatically removed |
|
|
5/6/15 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
Great staff. We love dr Scott and dr hunter. They make us feel like family and always give the best option for our pet
|
|
|
|
7/11/14 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
Excellent clinic. Dr. Brigdon has always taken great care of our fur babies. Very down to earth and always has time for questions
|
|
|
|
5/24/13 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
I would not recommend Dr. Hunter Brigdon to anyone. August 2012 Scarlett was diagnosed with heartworm. She had been on Trifexis since we adopted her in May 2012, and the vet had started heartworm treatment with Immiticide and Doxycycline, what he referred to as his "quick kill" method. He did a repeat test, which came back negative in October.
Today, I took her to a new vet. She tested positive for heartworm. Come to find out: he did not use the approved treatment for heartworm and created his own "split dose" method (as he called it today when I spoke with him). He also did a smear test (checks for babies) and not a snap test (which checks for adults).
What I'm trying to process is this: if there is a suggested protocol out there, why did he feel the need to get creative with her treatment? Why would he only retest with a smear, when she was initially being treated for ADULTS (needing another snap).
|
|
|
|
7/24/12 |
4 |
5 |
2 |
1 |
Bad practice with no explanation of why the pet dead. Blood work being done after the dog had passed away and still charge for it. I still not understand the logic. Bring your pet somewhere else
|
|
Rate this veterinary clinic
|
|
